Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff must prove \exposure greater than normal SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 17 (0) 1947A 44P4fre. background levels. . . to a proven hazardous substance\ in order to recover on a medical monitoring claim
• stating that the plaintiffs “requested equitable relief under section 6020.1115(b) in the form of a - 12 - J-A09031-24 medical monitoring trust fund, which they claim is a cognizable response cost under section 6020.702(a)”
• observing that allowing the plaintiffs to recover the costs of medical monitoring “avoids the potential injustice of forcing an economically disadvantaged person to pay for expensive diagnostic examinations necessitated by another’s negligence” (citation omitted)
• appointing trustees and special masters to administer a medical monitoring program as part of a $78 million settlement
• setting forth seven elements a plaintiff must prove in order to prevail on a claim for medical monitoring
• requiring a medical monitoring plaintiff to demonstrate that the \prescribed monitoring regime is different from that normally recommended in the absence of the exposure\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).