Skip to main content
· 8/7/2009

Redington Grand, LLP v. Level 10 Properties, LLC

Citations

  • 22 So. 3d 604
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10971
  • 2009 WL 2408334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[o]bligation pertains to the consideration” and adding that “[m]utual obligation is essential” to a valid contract (quoting Bacon v. Karr, 139 So. 2d 166, 169 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962))
  • interpreting language that buyer “may either” get deposit “or” seek specific performance to mean that “the contract limited the [b]uyers’ remedy to the return of all deposits or specific performance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Villanti, Khouzam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.