Skip to main content
· 8/20/2004

Redick v. State

Citations

  • 858 A.2d 947
  • 2004 Del. LEXIS 361
  • 2004 WL 1965050

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the trial court’s award of restitution to a cable provider was supported by the evidence presented at the hearing, based on sound deductive reasoning and was significantly less than the amount requested
  • “An award of restitution, based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, does not preclude a victim . . . from pursuing an action for civil damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.