Skip to main content
· 2/1/1983

Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc.

Citations

  • 557 F. Supp. 230
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19585

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, inter alia, that the Boston Symphony Orchestra’s conduct in canceling celebrity’s contract did not rise to the level sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss
  • highlighting Russell & Co. v. Polk Co. Abstract Co., 87 Iowa 233, 54 N.W. 212, 213 (1898
  • \tort actions protect interests in freedom from harms incident to intrusions upon legally protected interests\
  • “tort actions protect interests in freedom from harms incident to intrusions upon legally protected interests”
  • “a breach of contract is not, standing alone, a tort as well”
  • “a breach of contract is not, standing alone, a tort as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keeton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.