Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding that “as a matter of law, one is injured if one is sexually abused”
• holding that the insurer did not waive its right to invoke policy exclusions by failing to respond to insured’s notice of claim within the 60-day statutory period and instead taking over two years
• recognizing breadth of “arising out of’ in exclusion, in contrast with coverage language that specifies certain activities where policy coverage does not “apply”
• noting that the distinction respecting “arising out of’ exclusions “may be a fine one” but is “appropriate and sound”
• explaining breadth of “arising out of’ exclusion, although not contained in policy at issue in ease
• construing policy that stated that its coverage was “excess over and above any other valid and collectible insurance (including any deductible portion) or agreement of indemnity, available to the insured” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).