Reddington v. Philad. Traction Co.
Citations
- 132 Pa. 154
- 19 A. 28
- 1890 Pa. LEXIS 783
Syllabus
<p>When the plaintiff, in an action against a street-railway company for negligence, received his injuries while attempting to board the defendant’s car while in motion, with one of his arms encumbered, his foot slipping from the step from a jolt of the car, it was not error to enter judgment of nonsuit.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the Board cannot be said to have abused its discretion in denying a request for a rehearing where a “[c]laimant has failed to show how the newly[-]discovered evidence could change the outcome of the case”
- stating that the Board cannot be said to have abused its discretion in denying a request for a rehearing where a “[c]laimant has failed to show how the newly discovered evidence could change the outcome of the case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.