Skip to main content
· 2/28/2022

Redding v. Cantrell

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 567

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in fashioning a fair and just remedy where there was conflicting evidence in the record concerning the use of proceeds from a line of credit. In addition, the trial court did not err in denying cotenant's claim for reasonable rental value. Though an owner out of possession is entitled to testify concerning the reasonable rental value of the property, the trial court was not required to accept it. Finally, the trial court did not err by denying cross-appellant's claim that he should be credited for improvements on the land where neither party benefited solely from the improvements.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.