Reddick v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, as part of the Faretta inquiry, \the trial court can and should inform the defendant of the potential perils and pitfalls of self-representation\
• reversing and remanding for a new trial at which the defendant could represent himself after the trial court failed to hold a proper Faretta hearing
• reversing and remanding for a new trial at which the defendant could represent himself after the trial court failed to hold a proper Faretta hearing
• \The standard of review applicable to trial court rulings on motions seeking the right to self-representation in a criminal trial is abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-06· cited 11×
• Morgan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-01· cited 6×
• McGee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-20· cited 6×
• Goldsmith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-09· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• State v. Bowen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 70×
• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-28· cited 52×
• Beaton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-01· cited 7×
• McKinney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 7×
• Wheeler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-05· cited 5×