Redden v. McGill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that findings and recommendations of masters that have not been subject to meaningful judicial review are not deemed final judgments appealable to this Court
• holding that the Court’s appellate jurisdiction over civil proceedings in the Family Court is “limited to orders, rulings, decisions or judgments of the judges of [the Family] Court”
• holding that the Court’s appellate jurisdiction over civil proceedings in the Family Court is “limited to orders, rulings, decisions or judgments of the judges of [the Family] Court”
• dismissing as interlocutory an appeal from a decision of a Family Court master

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).