Reddell v. Reddell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the court must consider the wife's retirement account and stocks amassed during marriage as well as husband's
• holding $3,500 IRA accumulated during marriage to be marital property
• holding $3,500 IRA accumulated during marriage to be marital property
• citing, Carrow v. Carrow, 642 So. 2d 901, 904 (Miss. 1994)
• failure to classify wife’s pension as marital asset reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).