Redd v. Ingram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no abuse of discretion to allow supportive reputation testimony after impeachment by cross-examination and introduction of contradictory testimony
• the giving of “inconsistent instructions is error, unless it plainly appears from the record that the jury could not have been misled by them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).