Skip to main content
· 5/13/1998

Redd v. City of Enterprise

Citations

  • 140 F.3d 1378
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9568
  • 1998 WL 238730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the existence of prob- able cause for an arrest is a complete defense to a First Amendment retaliation claim under the doctrine of quali- fied immunity
  • holding that when probable cause supports an arrest, an officer “is justified in arresting that person, even if the offender may be speaking at the time that he is arrested”
  • holding that probable cause generally bars claims for First Amendment violations
  • explaining that when a police officer has probable cause to believe that a person is committing a particular public offense, the officer may lawfully arrest that person, even though the offender is engaged in protected First Amendment activity
  • to be lawful, detention that is more than a mere investigatory stop or an arrest must be supported by probable cause
  • “It is clearly established that an arrest made without probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Dubina, Stagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.