Redco Corporation v. Cbs, Inc. And the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with district court that factual bases for all stated opinions were adequately disclosed in news story regarding multi-piece tire rims
• upholding district court’s classification of “catchy phrases or hyperbole” as non-actionable under Pennsylvania law
• “court may determine that allegedly defamatory statements are true if a reasonable jury could come to only one conclusion.”
• unless defendants “can be found liable for defamation, the intentional interference with contractual relations count is not actionable”
• “court’s function is to decide if a communication is capable of a defamatory meaning”
• same for statements about the risks of plaintiff’s tire rims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).