Skip to main content
· 8/20/1996

Red Wing Motel Investors v. Red Wing Fire Department

Citations

  • 552 N.W.2d 295
  • 1996 Minn. App. LEXIS 982
  • 1996 WL 469299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that pipes in a motel sprinkler system were ordinary building materials, not machinery or equipment
  • holding that a fire-suppression system’s pipes and sprinkler heads were not “equipment”
  • treating a sprinkler system for fire protection purposes as an “improvement” to real property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willis, Davies, Harten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.