Red Dog v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “decisions relating to the objectives of litigation [are] essentially [those] of the client, whose decision the attorney must respect”
• attorney allowed to withdraw from representation of criminal defendant who made deliberate decision to accept death penalty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taylor v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2019-07-08· cited 18×
• Bradshaw v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2002-06-13· cited 17×
• In Re the State for a Writ of Mandamus
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2007-02-16· cited 6×
• Giammalvo v. Sunshine Mining Co.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-07-14· cited 5×
• Guardianship of L.H.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-01-24· cited 3×
• Transperfect Global, Inc. v. Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2022-03-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Judy v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-01-30· cited 96×
• Kirk B. Lenhard v. Charles Wolff
  Supreme Court· 1979-09-07· cited 54×
• Red Dog v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-02-27· cited 5×
• Waters v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1981-08-18· cited 4×