Recupero v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that district court’s resolution of disputes about the scope of the record on review is typically not deferential
• noting the futility of remand where the appellant “entirely failed . . . to make any proffer of relevant evidence” or factual dispute regarding a plan interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).