Skip to main content
· 1/27/2005

Rector v. City and County of Denver

Citations

  • 122 P.3d 1010
  • 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 110
  • 2005 WL 170733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting plaintiffs' argument that threats of a late fee, seizure of a vehicle, and additional impoundment, towing, and storage fees, exempted plaintiffs from the voluntary payment rule because payments of late fees were coerced
  • rejecting plaintiffs' argument that threats of a late fee, seizure of a vehicle, and additional impoundment, towing, and storage fees, exempted plaintiffs from the voluntary payment rule because payments of late fees were coerced
  • “[B]ecause of our conclusion that the declaratory and injunctive relief claim was wrongly dismissed, defendants cannot recover their attorney fees under [section] 13-17-201.”
  • § 13-17-201 “requires courts to award a defendant reasonable attorney fees whenever an entire tort action, but not merely one or more tort claims, is dismissed under C.R.C.P. 12(b)”
  • “When a trial court does not engage in the proper C.R.C.P. 12(b) analysis, a reviewing court need not remand if it can resolve the issue as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webb, Roy, Graham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.