Skip to main content
· 9/20/2001

Recreational Fishing Alliance v. Evans

Citations

  • 172 F. Supp. 2d 35
  • 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20284
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15048
  • 2001 WL 1474733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While economic effects must be taken into account, such effects were not meant to trump the real purpose of the [MSA], which is to preserve and protect United States fisheries.” (emphasis added)
  • “An agency is not required to collect additional evidence under the [MSA].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.