Recovery Funding, L.L.C. v. Beckman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The employee’s § 36 claim was not a continuation of his original § 34 claim, but was, rather, a separate and distinct claim of a different nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).