· 12/16/1982

Records & Tapes, Inc. v. Argus, Inc.

Citations

655 P.2d 133
8 Kan. App. 2d 255
35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 301
1982 Kan. App. LEXIS 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that filing under “Argus Tapes and Records,” instead of the legal name of “Argus, Inc.,” was not seriously misleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott, Flood, Brookens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.