Record Steel & Construction, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a facility was an improvement to real property under R.C. 2305.131 was a question of law when the facts were undisputed
• holding that whether a facility was an improvement to real property under R.C. 2305.131 was a question of law when the facts were undisputed
• holding that “[c]onstruction of a statute is not a question of fact but a question of law”
• holding 10-year statute of repose violated state constitutional right to remedy in personal injury and wrongful death suits
• finding Ohio Rev.Code § 2305.131, a statute of repose, violative of Ohio’s constitutional right to a remedy
• focusing on whether the item “increased value ... to the realty when installed for its intended purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).