· 3/31/1953
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Duke
Citations
- 14 F.R.D. 265
- 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3841
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting party’s argument that it could circumvent the safe harbor requirement by the court’s grant of leave to file motion for sanctions
- district court granting leave to defendants to “move for sanctions ‘if they desire to do so’” did not circumvent the safe-harbor provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coleman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.