Skip to main content
· 3/31/1953

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Duke

Citations

  • 14 F.R.D. 265
  • 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting party’s argument that it could circumvent the safe harbor requirement by the court’s grant of leave to file motion for sanctions
  • district court granting leave to defendants to “move for sanctions ‘if they desire to do so’” did not circumvent the safe-harbor provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.