Reckitt Benckiser Inc. v. Motomco Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a party cannot “assert an equitable interest in the perpetuation of an advertís-, ing campaign that is literally false”
• noting a party cannot “assert an equitable interest in the perpetuation of an advertising campaign that - is literally false”
• “If the movant fails to make a showing of irreparable harm, the motion for a preliminary injunction [or TRO] must fail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• C=Holdings B.V. v. Asiarim Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2013-12-16· cited 45×
• V.W. ex rel. Williams v. Conway
  N.D. New York· 2017-02-22· cited 35×
• Merck Eprova AG v. Gnosis S.p.A.
  S.D. New York· 2012-09-30· cited 29×
• Litwin v. Oceanfreight, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2011-11-02· cited 22×
• Chobani, LLC v. Dannon Co.
  N.D. New York· 2016-01-29· cited 19×
• A.T. v. Harder
  N.D. New York· 2018-04-04· cited 13×
• LSSI Data Corp. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2012-05-23· cited 9×
• General Mills, Inc. v. Chobani, LLC
  N.D. New York· 2016-01-29· cited 8×
• Step by Step, Inc. v. City of Ogdensburg
  N.D. New York· 2016-04-05· cited 8×
• Avitabile v. Beach
  N.D. New York· 2017-09-28· cited 6×
• Brooks v. Roberts
  N.D. New York· 2017-05-05· cited 5×
• United States v. Swartz
  N.D. New York· 2019-08-09