Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/8/2006

Recio v. GR-MHA CORP.

Citations

851 N.E.2d 106
366 Ill. App. 3d 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

burden of protecting against the danger of a post “located immediately outside” the defendant’s store was slight, as a “simple warning” might have sufficed
“We therefore specifically held in [Ross] that although a violation of OSHA regulations may be evidence of failure to exercise reasonable care, OSHA regulations do not create a duty of care.”
“We therefore specifically held in [Ross] that although a violation of OSHA regulations may be evidence of failure to exercise reasonable care, OSHA regulations do not create a duty of care.”
“where a statute or ordinance did not create a private right of action, its violation would only be relevant to whether the defendant ‘had acted with less than reasonable care’ [but i]t would not have the effect of creating a duty to [the plaintiff] where none existed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Recio v. GR-MHA CORP.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.