Recio v. GR-MHA CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• burden of protecting against the danger of a post “located immediately outside” the defendant’s store was slight, as a “simple warning” might have sufficed
• “We therefore specifically held in [Ross] that although a violation of OSHA regulations may be evidence of failure to exercise reasonable care, OSHA regulations do not create a duty of care.”
• “We therefore specifically held in [Ross] that although a violation of OSHA regulations may be evidence of failure to exercise reasonable care, OSHA regulations do not create a duty of care.”
• “where a statute or ordinance did not create a private right of action, its violation would only be relevant to whether the defendant ‘had acted with less than reasonable care’ [but i]t would not have the effect of creating a duty to [the plaintiff] where none existed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).