Recchi America Inc. v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that its holding “invalidates the irrebuttable presumption altogether,” including as duration of temporary benefits, § 440.15(2)(a), Fla. Stat.; (3) an extensive fraud and penalty provision, § 440.105, Fla. Stat.; (4
• declaring an irrebuttable presumption invalid as a violation of due process where the statute plainly and expressly included a presumption that an accident was primarily caused by the worker’s intoxication if that worker’s urine test revealed the presence of alcohol or drugs
• section 440.09(3)’s then-existing conclusive presumption that injury in drug-free workplace was caused by claimant’s intoxication due to positive drug test violates due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).