Rebouche v. Harvey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Pleading specific personal jurisdiction under Rule 4(k)(2) requires demonstrating a close nexus between the United States, the foreign defendant's conduct, and the plaintiff's claim.”
• “The fourth factor considers the closeness of any relationship between the defendant and the terrorist organization.” (emphasis added)
• “The ATA does not provide a definition of aiding and abetting liability, but instead incorporates the analysis in Halberstam . . . .”
• “[I]t [is not] plausible to infer that an attack on a secret CIA base in Afghanistan would further HSBC’s alleged objective of maximizing profits through the evasion of U.S. sanctions.”
• “Because the foreign banks are global financial institutions with legitimate operations and uncertain ties to al- Qaeda, we cannot infer substantial assistance to al-Qaeda from [appellee’s] lengthy business relationships with the foreign banks.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).