Skip to main content
· 7/26/1985

Rebman v. FLAGSHIP FIRST NAT. BANK

Citations

  • 472 So. 2d 1360
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • question of intent is one of law for the court when there is no conflict in material facts
  • “any amounts advanced by a lender which directly or indirectly benefit the borrower — as well as any amounts directly received by a borrower — should be a part of the principal used for calculating interest under our usury law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.