· 7/26/1985
Rebman v. FLAGSHIP FIRST NAT. BANK
Citations
- 472 So. 2d 1360
- 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- question of intent is one of law for the court when there is no conflict in material facts
- “any amounts advanced by a lender which directly or indirectly benefit the borrower — as well as any amounts directly received by a borrower — should be a part of the principal used for calculating interest under our usury law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Danahy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.