Skip to main content
· 8/7/2000

Rebert v. Rebert

Citations

  • 757 A.2d 981
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 225
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The court barely acknowledged that Father requested in person visitation and appears to place blame on Father for not being present for the hearing in this matter.”
  • “`De novo’ review entails, as the term suggests, full consideration of the case anew. The reviewing body is in effect substituted for the prior decision[-]maker and redecides the case.”
  • “‘De novo’ review entails, as the term suggests, full consideration of the case anew. The reviewing body is in effect substituted for the prior decision maker and redecides the case.”
  • “‘De novo’ review entails, as the term suggests, full consideration of the case anew. The reviewing body is in effect substituted for the prior decision maker and redecides the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melvin, Cercone, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.