· 8/7/2000
Rebert v. Rebert
Citations
- 757 A.2d 981
- 2000 Pa. Super. 225
- 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2011
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The court barely acknowledged that Father requested in person visitation and appears to place blame on Father for not being present for the hearing in this matter.”
- “`De novo’ review entails, as the term suggests, full consideration of the case anew. The reviewing body is in effect substituted for the prior decision[-]maker and redecides the case.”
- “‘De novo’ review entails, as the term suggests, full consideration of the case anew. The reviewing body is in effect substituted for the prior decision maker and redecides the case.”
- “‘De novo’ review entails, as the term suggests, full consideration of the case anew. The reviewing body is in effect substituted for the prior decision maker and redecides the case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Melvin, Cercone, Beck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.