Skip to main content
· 7/16/2015

Rebecca Shirrell v. St. Francis Medical Center

Citations

  • 793 F.3d 881
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12260
  • 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,355
  • 127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1191
  • 2015 WL 4285696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that McDonnell Douglas cases are subject to the but-for causation standard set forth in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, 133 S. Ct. 2517 (2013)
  • applying the McDonnell Douglas framework to a Title VII retaliation claim using the but-for standard articulated in Nassar.
  • “To show a causal connection, a plaintiff must show that her protected activity was a but-for cause of her employer’s adverse action.”
  • protected activity was not a but-for cause where the “uncontroverted evidence” showed plaintiff was fired for disciplinary reasons
  • “Circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination include treating similarly situated employees who are not members of the protected class in a different manner.”
  • applying McDonnell Douglas to a Title VII claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Loken, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.