Rebecca Livoti v. Anthony Livoti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing subsequent “evidence that the defendant was abusing altar boys from his own parish almost continually over a decade * * * because it demonstrates the ongoing nature of [his] behavior” (emphasis added)
• allowing subsequent 4 Count 3, which bears no resemblance at all to the incident Beth described, involved an incident which occurred eleven years earlier. I acknowledge that the interval between count 3 and the 404(b
• evidence not too remote despite nine-year gap because it “demonstrate[d] the ongoing nature of the defendant’s behavior”
• event useful to show pattern of conduct, which may explain defendant’s intent, corroborate victim’s testimony, or counter defendant’s denial
• “[C]ase law is particularly clear that evidence of uncharged sexual misconduct, when not too remote in time,. . . may also be admitted to corroborate the victim’s testimony ....”
• uncharged assaults separated by six and nine years, but intervening period not eventless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).