· 12/23/1996
Rebecca Hoekstra, by and Through Her Parents, John and Sandra Hoekstra v. Independent School District, No. 283
Citations
- 103 F.3d 624
- 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1469
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33334
- 1996 WL 731892
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “enforcement remedies, procedures and rights under Title II of the ADA are the same as under § 504”
- applying the bad faith or gross misjudgment standard to district’s failure to provide a disabled student access to an elevator
- “[E]nforcement remedies, procedures and rights under Title II of the ADA are the same as under § 504].}’
- successful ADA claim in context of educational services requires showing of gross misjudgment or bad faith
- Plaintiffs seeking damages under § 1983 for alleged deprivation of their daughter’s right to a free appropriate public education under the IDEA failed to state a claim under the IDEA, and thus failed to state a claim under § 1983.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beam, Lay, Loken
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.