Reaves v. Ainsworth
Citations
- 219 U.S. 296
- 31 S. Ct. 230
- 55 L. Ed. 225
- 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1637
Syllabus
<p>Under the act of October 1, 1890, c. 1241, 26 Stat. 562, regulating examinations and promotions in the army, the board of examiners may mgke a provisional order giving the officer a reasonable period for reexamination and sueh an order is not final but provisional, and does not deprive the board of jurisdiction to subsequently determine the fitness of officer for duty.</p> <p>What is due process of law depends upon circumstances. To those in .the military or naval service of the United States military law is due process;.and the decision of a military tribunal acting within scope of its lawful powers cannot be reviewed or set aside by the courts.</p> <p>The purpose of the act of October 1, 1890, is to secure efficiency and the only relief from error or injustice in the order of the board is by review of the President. The courts have no power of review.</p> <p>Courts are not the only instrumentalities of government; they cannot command or regulate the army, and the welfare and safety of the country, through the efficiency of officers of the army, is greater than the value of his commission, or the right of promotion of any officer of the army.</p> <p>There is a difference between the regular army of the Nation and the militia of a State when not in service (of the Nation,' and more rigid rules and a higher state of discipline are required in the former than in the latter.</p> <p>28 App. D. C. 157, affirmed.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to review claim that Army medical board’s finding that plaintiff was unfit for promotion was arbitrary and capricious
- order of discharge of army officer based upon failure to meet medical fitness requirements not reviewable, as such would cause great “embarrassment” and “detriment”, to the army
- declinging to review discharge for mental unfitness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.