Skip to main content
· 1/5/1925

Reaver v. Walch

Citations

  • 3 F.2d 204
  • 55 App. D.C. 159
  • 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed “the long-standing rule that a reviewing court will uphold the trial court’s decision to exclude evidence if the record does not contain a proffer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hatfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.