· 1/5/1925
Reaver v. Walch
Citations
- 3 F.2d 204
- 55 App. D.C. 159
- 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3727
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed “the long-standing rule that a reviewing court will uphold the trial court’s decision to exclude evidence if the record does not contain a proffer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hatfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.