Skip to main content
· 6/14/2005

Reames v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma Health Care Authority

Citations

  • 411 F.3d 1164
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11157
  • 2005 WL 1395105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Oklahoma Department of Human Services and the Oklahoma Health Care Authority qualified for Eleventh Amendment immunity
  • holding that § 407(a) prevents SSDI recipient from assigning benefits to Special Needs Trust
  • noting Eleventh Amendment not violated by expenditures ancillary to an order requiring compliance with federal law
  • “The Eleventh Amendment does not prevent plaintiffs from bringing suits against state officials ... in their individual and personal capacities.”
  • “The Eleventh Amendment does not prevent plaintiffs from bringing suits against state officials . . . in their individual and personal capacities.”
  • 'To tinker with !\\ that scheme could open the door lor a loss of protection down the road'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, McConnell, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.