Skip to main content
· 11/10/2004

RealVest Corp. v. Lane County

Citations

  • 100 P.3d 1109
  • 196 Or. App. 109
  • 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where county brought declaratory judgment action to prevent the plaintiffs from using certain land as a driveway, the core relief sought was equitable in nature and review on appeal was de novo
  • “For an implied dedication of land to the public to occur, there must be a clear and unequivocal manifestation by the owner of the property of an intent to devote it to public use.”
  • where the defendants’ counterclaims were filed to prevent the plaintiffs, through a declaratory judgment, from using a portion of the defendants’ lands as a driveway, the core relief sought was equitable in nature
  • interpreting “right of way” in deed language to be surplusage
  • discussing those as a single factor
  • discussing those as a single factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Armstrong, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.