· 11/10/2004
RealVest Corp. v. Lane County
Citations
- 100 P.3d 1109
- 196 Or. App. 109
- 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where county brought declaratory judgment action to prevent the plaintiffs from using certain land as a driveway, the core relief sought was equitable in nature and review on appeal was de novo
- “For an implied dedication of land to the public to occur, there must be a clear and unequivocal manifestation by the owner of the property of an intent to devote it to public use.”
- where the defendants’ counterclaims were filed to prevent the plaintiffs, through a declaratory judgment, from using a portion of the defendants’ lands as a driveway, the core relief sought was equitable in nature
- interpreting “right of way” in deed language to be surplusage
- discussing those as a single factor
- discussing those as a single factor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Armstrong, Schuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.