Realmuto v. Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is not a violation of constitutional rights to make an adverse inference from a refusal to respond under the Fifth Amendment to a relevant question in a civil proceeding
• Secretary of Transportation, as ultimate fact finder, is not bound by proposed report of hearing examiner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).