Reagan Tool Co. v. H. H. Butts Dredging & Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that based on party’s “representation to the court that documents responsive to this request either do not exist or have already been produced to plaintiffs, the motion to compel with respect to this request is denied”
• finding that based on party’s “representation to the court that documents responsive to this request either do not exist or have already been produced to plaintiffs, the motion to compel with respect to this request is denied”
• “a general statement that the discovery is overly broad and unduly burdensome . . . by itself is insufficient to deny discovery.”
• “Relevancy for discovery purposes is construed broadly. Discoverable evidence need not be admissible at trial; rather, material is discoverable if it is ‘reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).