Skip to main content
· 11/23/1984

Reader v. Dertina & Associates Marketing, Inc.

Citations

  • 693 P.2d 398
  • 1984 Colo. App. LEXIS 1293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • veil piercing applies “where the corporate entity has been used to defeat public convenience, or to justify or protect wrong, fraud, or crime, or in other similar situations where equity requires”
  • veil piercing applies “where the corporate entity has been used to defeat public convenience, or to justify or protect wrong, fraud, or crime, or in other similar situations where equity requires”
  • veil pierced to hold liable sole shareholder who sought to avoid paying benefits to brokers under a contract and used corporate entity as instrumentality for transaction of his own affairs, where adherence to corporate form would promote injustice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pierce, Sternberg, Babcock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.