· 4/1/1929
Read v. Work
Citations
- 32 F.2d 413
- 59 App. D.C. 22
- 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3780
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in construing former ORS 109.121 (1997), a related predecessor statute to ORS 109.119, we stated that the petitioner “had the burden to persuade the court that visitation — and to what extent — would be in the best interests of [the] child”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orsdel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.