Read v. Luther Gold Dredging Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Supreme Court in Alvarez was not asked to reevaluate the Ninth Circuit’s holding that time donning and doffing at the employer’s premise was a principal activity but endorsed that decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).