Rea v. Burt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the state law claims do not survive preemption because the Medicare Act governs the denial of coverage
• holding that plaintiff’s claims for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of contract arose from defendant’s alleged failure to make a timely coverage decision, thereby exacerbating his medical condition, were preempted by the Medicare Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).