Re Van Holt, Jo Van Holt v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over causes of action “alleging impropriety in the investigation and adjustment” of a claim since they are “intimately related to the disallowance of [an] insurance claim”
• stating that current expenditures are limited to $5,000
• stating “when WYO companies deplete their net premium income, a phenomenon that occurs regularly because the companies must forfeit a significant portion of the proceeds from their premiums, they draw money from FEMA through letters of credit to disburse claims”
• “Although WYO companies have the responsibility of defending against claims, FEMA reimburses the WYO companies for their defense costs.”
• “[A]n insured’s flood insurance claims are ultimately paid by FEMA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).