R.E. Ex Rel. J.E. v. New York City Department of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that IEP’s failure to provide for parent counseling and deficiencies in FBA did not cumulatively amount to violation of IDEIA
• holding that “determinations regarding the substantive adequacy of an IEP should be afforded more weight”
• holding that services beyond those listed in the IEP may not be considered in a Burlington/Carter analysis.
• concluding that IEP’s failure to provide for parent counseling and deficiencies in FBA did not cumulatively amount a violation of the IDEA
• holding that á disabled student’s IEP must be “reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits”
• concluding that IEP was procedurally inadequate, in part, due to school district’s failure to include statutorily mandated speech and language therapy in IEP

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).