Re-Alco Industries, Inc. v. National Center for Health Education, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no antitrust claim because plaintiff had not sufficiently alleged “an anticompetitive effect on the industry as a whole”
• “If a complaint fails to allege facts regarding substitute products, to distinguish among apparently comparable products, or to allege other pertinent facts relating to cross-elasticity of demand ... a court may grant a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.”
• dismissal for failure to plead a valid relevant market; plaintiff failed to allege that specific health education product was unique or explain why product was not part of the larger market for health education materials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).