R.D. Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the legislature chooses not to amend terms of a statute after judicial construction, it will be presumed that it has acquiesced in the court’s statement of legislative intent
• the Commission's denial of penalties was \not against the manifest weight of the evidence\
• where the legislature chooses not to amend terms of a statute after judicial construction, it will be presumed that it has acquiesced in the court's statement of legislative intent
• where the legislature chooses not to amend the terms of a statute after judicial construction, it will be presumed that it has acquiesced in the court’s statement of legislative intent
• “A related principle is that where the legislature chooses not to amend terms of a statute after judicial construction, it will be presumed that it has acquiesced in the court’s statement of legislative intent”
• each section 19(b) decision is a separate and appealable order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).