R.D. Ex Rel. Kareem v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a district court may not substitute its own views for those of the hearing officer in the IDEA context
• noting that in cases such as here, where the record is not supplemented, “particular deference is due” to “the Hearing Officer's findings [that] are based on credibility determinations of live witness testimony.”
• “Where the Hearing Officer’s findings are based on credibility determinations of live witness testimony, . . . and there is no supplementation of the record before the Court, particular deference is due to the Hearing Officer’s decision.”
• “Where the Hearing Officer’s findings are 34 based on credibility determinations of live witness testimony, . . . and there is no supplementation of the record before the Court, particular deference is due to the Hearing Officer’s decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).