R.C.M. Executive Gallery Corp. v. Rols Capital Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing RICO claims for lack of distinctness and noting that “an alleged association-in-fact does not have an existence apart from the [corporation] merely because the alleged racketeering activities are not legitimate [corporate] activities”
• dismissing RICO claims for lack of distinctness and noting that “an alleged association-in-fact does not have an existence apart from the [corporation] merely because the alleged racketeering activities are not legitimate [corporate] activities”
• “[T]here is no federal preemption of state law successor liability merely because the sale of assets occurred in a bankruptcy proceeding.”
• “[T]here is no federal preemption of state law successor liability merely because the sale of assets occurred in a bankruptcy proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).