R.C. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a trial court's finding that the appellant met criterion (d) where there was evidence that he adopted a gang's style of dress but not that he frequented the gang's area or associated with its known members
• reversing a trial court’s finding that the appellant met criterion (d) where there was evidence that he adopted a gang’s style of dress but not that he frequented the gang’s area or associated with its known members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• E.A.R. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 141×
• L.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-25· cited 5×
• EAR v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 1×
• LB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-25
• RC v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-05

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Singletary v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-10-29· cited 100×
• TS v. Clemons
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-29· cited 6×
• A.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-05· cited 5×