R.C. v. J.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The principal goal in child support matters is to serve the best interests of the child through provision of reasonable expenses\
• “The principal goal in child support matters is to serve the best interests of the child through provision of reasonable expenses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• S.S. v. K.F.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-07· cited 30×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Conway v. Dana
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-26· cited 177×
• Samii v. Samii
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-07· cited 51×
• Calabrese v. Calabrese
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-30· cited 40×
• McClain v. McClain
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-04-11· cited 40×
• Yerkes v. Yerkes
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-30· cited 37×
• Depp v. Holland
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-01-06· cited 33×
• Funk v. Funk
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-06· cited 28×
• Citizens Against Gambling Subsidies, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-02-23· cited 24×
• In Re Marriage of Van Winkle
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-06-16· cited 19×
• Seder v. Seder
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-01-22· cited 9×
• Belcher v. Belcher
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-10-31· cited 6×
• Conley v. Conley
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-12-30· cited 3×

Other cases named R.C. v. J.S.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• R.C. v. J.S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-18