RBC Mortgage Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s losses “were derived, not directly from the conduct of [employee], but from [employer’s] breach of the warranty contained in the brokerage agreement with [third party].”
• rejecting proximate cause as “too broad to capture accurately the intent behind the phrase ‘loss resulting directly from’ ”
• describing coverage as “fidelity insurance” and discussing the “language in a fidelity bond”
• describing coverage as “fidelity insurance” and discussing the “language in a fidelity bond”
• rejecting proximate-cause analysis of loss causation in financial- institution bond context
• “The question presented by a section 2-615 motion to dismiss is whether sufficient facts have been pled in the complaint which, if proved, would entitle plaintiff to relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).